News

The Venice Commission made a conclusion regarding the draft law on the selection of judges to the KSU: there are “significant improvements”, but there is still work to be done

Author:
Liza Brovko
Date:

The European Commission for Democracy through Law, or the so-called Venice Commission, published an opinion on draft law No. 9322 on the selection of judges to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. The main thing: Ukraine did not comply with all the recommendations of the commission, but the document has "significant improvements".

Among the unfulfilled recommendations: during the adoption of the draft law in the first reading, it was not added that a seventh member of the Advisory Group of Experts (AGE) is needed.

Instead, the Venice Commission "welcomed" the following changes in the document:

At the same time, the commission recommends:

In general, the Venice Commission is satisfied with the constructive approach of the Ukrainian authorities to the improvement of the draft law.

"The Venice Commission considers that the key recommendations it made in its December 2022 opinion and in the follow-up to that opinion have been implemented," the conclusion read.